Emerson and Thoreau were friends while they lived, both writers. Emerson was also importantly a lecturer. Thoreau was also a surveyor, doer of outdoor odd jobs, noticer of nature.
Now Thoreau is far more likely to be read voluntarily, spontaneously, not for school, than Emerson is.
It's sort of a classical/romantic split in the largest sense. Classical meaning carefully planned, solid, built in a logical way, and not carried away by emotion. Emerson's writing is like that. He's so careful and sober I can read some nasty or negative things he's written and not quite notice at first because he's stated them in such a sober grownup way.
The romantic, in the larger sense, is let by internal reactions than pre-existing ideas of what a work of art, an essay, should be like. The romantic starts with how the interaction between self and world feels, and gets structure from that. Maybe a fairly different structure for each piece. Thoreau.
Of course, all the arts, since they lived, have moved toward romantic.
Now Thoreau is far more likely to be read voluntarily, spontaneously, not for school, than Emerson is.
It's sort of a classical/romantic split in the largest sense. Classical meaning carefully planned, solid, built in a logical way, and not carried away by emotion. Emerson's writing is like that. He's so careful and sober I can read some nasty or negative things he's written and not quite notice at first because he's stated them in such a sober grownup way.
The romantic, in the larger sense, is let by internal reactions than pre-existing ideas of what a work of art, an essay, should be like. The romantic starts with how the interaction between self and world feels, and gets structure from that. Maybe a fairly different structure for each piece. Thoreau.
Of course, all the arts, since they lived, have moved toward romantic.
<< Home